Financing and cost-effectiveness analysis of public-private partnerships: provision of tuberculosis treatment in South Africa
2006

Cost-Effectiveness of Public-Private Partnerships for Tuberculosis Treatment in South Africa

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Edina Sinanovic, Lilani Kumaranayake

Primary Institution: University of Cape Town

Hypothesis

Can public-private partnerships (PPPs) improve the cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis treatment in South Africa?

Conclusion

Expanding public-private partnerships in tuberculosis treatment can significantly reduce costs and improve service accessibility.

Supporting Evidence

  • Cost per case cured was significantly lower in the public-non-government model compared to public sites.
  • Public-private partnerships could reduce government financing required per TB patient treated by up to 80%.
  • Treatment success rates varied between 74% and 89% across different models.

Takeaway

This study shows that working together with private companies can make treating tuberculosis cheaper and easier for patients.

Methodology

Cost and effectiveness data were collected from six sites providing directly observed treatment for a 12-month cohort of new sputum positive patients.

Potential Biases

The study may underestimate cost-effectiveness due to higher mortality rates in HIV-positive TB patients and selection bias in site selection.

Limitations

The study used non-randomized purposive sampling, which may not represent all communities and could lead to optimistic results.

Participant Demographics

Participants included low-income workers and residents from various urban and rural settings in South Africa.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1478-7547-4-11

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication