Audit of Surgical Treatment for Ovarian Cancer
Author Information
Author(s): Sengupta P S, Jayson G C, Slade R J, Eardley A, Radford J A
Primary Institution: Cancer Research Campaign and University of Manchester Department of Medical Oncology
Hypothesis
Are surgical management practices for ovarian cancer compliant with established guidelines?
Conclusion
The study found that compliance with surgical guidelines for ovarian cancer treatment was inadequate.
Supporting Evidence
- 92% of patients presented via an outpatient clinic, indicating elective surgery.
- Less than half of the patients underwent the recommended surgical procedure.
- The audit suggests a need for better compliance with surgical guidelines.
Takeaway
Doctors are not following the best practices for treating women with ovarian cancer, which could lead to worse care.
Methodology
A retrospective audit of surgical management practices for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients.
Limitations
The audit may not represent all hospitals and the sample size is not specified.
Participant Demographics
Patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer referred to the Christie Cancer Centre.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website