An audit of primary surgical treatment for women with ovarian cancer referred to a cancer centre
1999

Audit of Surgical Treatment for Ovarian Cancer

publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Sengupta P S, Jayson G C, Slade R J, Eardley A, Radford J A

Primary Institution: Cancer Research Campaign and University of Manchester Department of Medical Oncology

Hypothesis

Are surgical management practices for ovarian cancer compliant with established guidelines?

Conclusion

The study found that compliance with surgical guidelines for ovarian cancer treatment was inadequate.

Supporting Evidence

  • 92% of patients presented via an outpatient clinic, indicating elective surgery.
  • Less than half of the patients underwent the recommended surgical procedure.
  • The audit suggests a need for better compliance with surgical guidelines.

Takeaway

Doctors are not following the best practices for treating women with ovarian cancer, which could lead to worse care.

Methodology

A retrospective audit of surgical management practices for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients.

Limitations

The audit may not represent all hospitals and the sample size is not specified.

Participant Demographics

Patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer referred to the Christie Cancer Centre.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6690376

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication