Postoperative outcome of caesarean sections and other major emergency obstetric surgery by clinical officers and medical officers in Malawi
2007

Postoperative Outcomes of Caesarean Sections by Clinical Officers and Medical Officers in Malawi

Sample size: 2131 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Chilopora Garvey, Pereira Caetano, Kamwendo Francis, Chimbiri Agnes, Malunga Eddie, Bergström Staffan

Primary Institution: University of Malawi, College of Medicine

Hypothesis

The study aims to validate the advantages and disadvantages of delegating major obstetric surgery to non-doctors in Malawi.

Conclusion

Clinical officers perform the bulk of emergency obstetric operations at district hospitals in Malawi, with postoperative outcomes comparable to those of medical officers.

Supporting Evidence

  • Clinical officers performed 90% of all straight caesarean sections.
  • Postoperative outcomes were almost identical in the two groups in terms of maternal general condition.
  • Clinical officers performed 93% of major emergency obstetric operations in government district hospitals.

Takeaway

In Malawi, clinical officers do most emergency surgeries, and they do just as well as doctors in taking care of patients after surgery.

Methodology

Data from 2131 consecutive obstetric surgeries in 38 district hospitals were collected prospectively over three months.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the subjective nature of postoperative outcome evaluations.

Limitations

The subjectivity of evaluations and the lack of blinding in assessing outcomes may introduce bias.

Participant Demographics

The study included women undergoing caesarean sections, with a comparable profile of patients operated on by clinical officers and medical officers.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1478-4491-5-17

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication