Overall asthma control achieved with budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy for patients on different treatment steps
2011

Budesonide/Formoterol for Asthma Control

Sample size: 12512 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Eric D Bateman, Tim W Harrison, Santiago Quirce, Helen K Reddel, Roland Buhl, Marc Humbert, Christine R Jenkins, Stefan Peterson, Ollie Östlund, Paul M O'Byrne, Malcolm R Sears, Göran S Eriksson

Hypothesis

Does budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy improve asthma control compared to other treatments at different GINA steps?

Conclusion

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy is more effective for asthma control and reduces exacerbations compared to other treatments for patients on Steps 2 to 4 of asthma guidelines.

Supporting Evidence

  • BUD/FORM therapy achieved higher rates of asthma control compared to higher maintenance dose ICS + SABA.
  • Exacerbation rates were lower with BUD/FORM therapy across all treatment steps.
  • Patients on higher treatment steps had lower FEV1 and higher symptom scores.

Takeaway

Using budesonide/formoterol helps people with asthma breathe better and have fewer attacks, especially if their current treatment isn't working well.

Methodology

Post hoc analysis of five large clinical trials comparing budesonide/formoterol therapy with other treatments across different GINA treatment steps.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to retrospective analysis and lack of randomization in treatment assignment.

Limitations

This is a post hoc analysis, and patients were not randomized according to GINA treatment step; control assessment was based on patient diary data.

Participant Demographics

Patients aged 12 years and older with asthma, stratified by GINA treatment steps 2, 3, and 4.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Confidence Interval

95% CI: Step 2, 2.18 (0.22, 4.14); Step 3, 3.58 (2.29, 4.87); Step 4, 3.83 (2.25, 5.40)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1465-9921-12-38

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication