Comparing Two Methods for Assessing Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Myopic Glaucoma
Author Information
Author(s): Morishita S, Tanabe T, Yu S, Hangai M, Ojima T, Aikawa H, Yoshimura N
Primary Institution: Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
Hypothesis
Is enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) better than variable corneal compensation (VCC) for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in myopic glaucomatous eyes?
Conclusion
ECC scans showed a better retardation pattern and structure–function relationship than VCC, making ECC more suitable for RNFL assessment in glaucomatous eyes that are moderately to highly myopic.
Supporting Evidence
- ECC scans showed a significantly higher typical scan score (TSS) than VCC scans.
- The prevalence of atypical retardation pattern (ARP) was significantly lower with ECC compared to VCC.
- In both myopic groups, RNFL thickness was significantly higher with VCC than with ECC.
Takeaway
This study looked at two ways to check the health of the eye in people with myopia and glaucoma. It found that one method (ECC) works better than the other (VCC).
Methodology
The study included 75 eyes with open-angle glaucoma, divided into moderately myopic (40 eyes) and highly myopic (35 eyes) groups, and compared GDx VCC and ECC assessments.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the retrospective nature of the study and selection criteria.
Limitations
The study was retrospective and did not analyze axial length data for all subjects.
Participant Demographics
Participants were under age 60 with open-angle glaucoma and varying degrees of myopia.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.0001
Statistical Significance
p<0.0001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website