Evaluation of a Mixture Model for Nuchal Translucency Measurements in Down's Syndrome Screening
Author Information
Author(s): J P Bestwick, W J Huttly, N J Wald
Primary Institution: Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and the London Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry
Hypothesis
Does the proposed mixture model method improve the efficacy of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome compared to the standard method?
Conclusion
The mixture model method offers no advantage over the standard MoM method in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.
Supporting Evidence
- The mixture model method showed similar discrimination ability to the standard MoM method.
- At a 70% detection rate, the false-positive rates were 12% for the mixture model and 10% for the MoM method.
- The accuracy of risk estimation was marginally better using the standard MoM method.
Takeaway
This study looked at two ways to measure a baby's neck thickness to check for Down's syndrome. It found that the simpler method works just as well as the more complicated one.
Methodology
The study compared the mixture model method with the standard MoM method using data from 104 affected and 22,284 unaffected pregnancies.
Potential Biases
The mixture model may be too tailored to the specific data-set used.
Limitations
The mixture model may not be generalizable to other data-sets and is more complicated.
Participant Demographics
104 affected pregnancies and 22,284 unaffected pregnancies.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website