Reconsidering Mandatory Retirement for Politicians: A Multidisciplinary Approach
2024

Reconsidering Mandatory Retirement for Politicians

publication

Author Information

Author(s): Tzemah-Shahar Roy, Menashe Aviad

Primary Institution: University of Haifa

Hypothesis

Is there a case for considering mandatory retirement age for politicians, and under what circumstances?

Conclusion

Chronological age alone is insufficient to determine an individual’s ability to participate in the workforce, suggesting that biological age metrics may be a better alternative for mandatory retirement considerations.

Supporting Evidence

  • The advanced age of politicians raises questions across various research fields.
  • Older politicians may hinder the rise of new generations but are often seen as experienced.
  • There is no consensus on the ability of older politicians to perform adequately.

Takeaway

This study looks at whether politicians should have a retirement age, considering that older politicians can be both experienced and possibly less capable due to age.

Methodology

The study reviews literature, laws, media reports, and health research on age and work performance.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1093/geroni/igae098.3248

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication