The experience of admission to psychiatric hospital among Chinese adult patients in Hong Kong
2008

Understanding Psychiatric Hospital Admissions in Hong Kong

Sample size: 135 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Fu Jackie Chi-Kin, Chow Paulina Po-Ling, Lam Linda Chiu-Wa

Primary Institution: Castle Peak Hospital, Hong Kong

Hypothesis

The study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties and cultural appropriateness of the Chinese translation of the Admission Experience Survey (AES).

Conclusion

The Chinese AES is a reliable tool for assessing the experience of psychiatric admission, highlighting issues of negative pressure, process exclusion, and perceived coercion.

Supporting Evidence

  • The C-AES showed good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha values for its subscales.
  • Patients subjected to objective coercive measures reported significantly higher C-AES scores.
  • The study identified three factors related to the admission experience: negative pressure, process exclusion, and perceived coercion.

Takeaway

This study looked at how patients feel when they are admitted to a psychiatric hospital in Hong Kong, showing that those who are forced to go feel more pressure and less control.

Methodology

The study involved translating the Admission Experience Survey into Chinese, validating it through focus groups and expert reviews, and administering it to 135 psychiatric patients within 48 hours of admission.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the subjective nature of patient experiences and the exclusion of certain patient groups.

Limitations

The study did not validate the C-AES for cognitively impaired patients and excluded some patients who might have experienced coercion.

Participant Demographics

The mean age of participants was 38.19 years, with a female to male ratio of 1:1.18.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% confidence interval 1.07 – 1.17

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-244X-8-86

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication