Impact of Acute Rejection on Kidney Allograft Outcomes in Recipients on Rapid Steroid Withdrawal
2011

Impact of Acute Rejection on Kidney Allograft Outcomes in Recipients on Rapid Steroid Withdrawal

Sample size: 457 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): R. L. Heilman, S. Nijim, H. A. Chakkera, Y. Devarapalli, A. A. Moss, D. C. Mulligan, M. J. Mazur, K. Hamawi, J. W. Williams, K. S. Reddy

Primary Institution: Mayo Clinic

Hypothesis

The study aims to investigate the impact of clinical acute rejection and subclinical rejection on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients treated with rapid steroid withdrawal.

Conclusion

Both subclinical and clinical acute rejection are associated with inferior graft survival in kidney transplant recipients on rapid steroid withdrawal.

Supporting Evidence

  • 10% of patients experienced subclinical rejection, while 7.8% had clinical rejection.
  • The estimated 5-year death-censored graft survival was 81% in subclinical rejection and 78% in clinical rejection.
  • Significant differences in graft survival were observed between rejection groups and the control group.

Takeaway

This study found that when kidney transplant patients stop taking steroids quickly, those who experience rejection of the kidney have a harder time keeping their transplant healthy.

Methodology

This retrospective study included all adult kidney transplant recipients treated with rapid steroid withdrawal from July 2003 to June 2008, analyzing death-censored graft survival as the primary outcome.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the retrospective nature of the study and the exclusion of certain patient groups.

Limitations

The study is retrospective and may not account for all variables influencing graft survival.

Participant Demographics

The study included adult kidney transplant recipients, with a mean age of approximately 53 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P < .0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 3.39–24.2 for CR vs control; 95% CI 1.30–13.7 for SR vs control

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/2011/583981

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication