A Re-Examination of Wolbachia-Induced Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in California Drosophila simulans
2011

Wolbachia and Egg Hatching in Drosophila

Sample size: 1082 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Carrington Lauren B., Lipkowitz Jeremy R., Hoffmann Ary A., Turelli Michael

Primary Institution: University of Melbourne, University of California Davis

Hypothesis

Has the intensity of cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) evolved in California Drosophila simulans due to Wolbachia infection?

Conclusion

The study found that while the key parameters governing Wolbachia infection dynamics have remained stable, there is evidence that Wolbachia may have evolved to produce less intense cytoplasmic incompatibility.

Supporting Evidence

  • The infection frequency of Wolbachia in Drosophila simulans was found to be about 93%.
  • Laboratory data suggested that Wolbachia may have evolved to produce less intense cytoplasmic incompatibility.
  • Field estimates of hatch rates from incompatible fertilizations were lower than previously reported.

Takeaway

This study looked at how a bacteria called Wolbachia affects the hatching of fruit fly eggs. They found that the bacteria has changed over time to be less harmful to the flies' eggs.

Methodology

The researchers collected Drosophila simulans from the field and conducted experiments to estimate the parameters of maternal transmission, fecundity, and cytoplasmic incompatibility.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the selection of fly lines and the conditions under which experiments were conducted.

Limitations

The study may not account for all environmental factors affecting the flies, and the laboratory conditions may differ from natural settings.

Participant Demographics

The study involved wild-caught Drosophila simulans from various locations in California.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.001

Confidence Interval

(0.915, 0.946)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0022565

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication