Patients' and Caregivers' Views on PEG Tube Placement
Author Information
Author(s): Anis Muhammad K, Abid Shahab, Jafri Wasim, Abbas Zaigham, Shah Hasnain A, Hamid Saeed, Wasaya Rozina
Primary Institution: Aga Khan University Hospital
Hypothesis
The study aims to assess the outcomes and perspectives of patients and caregivers regarding the acceptability of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement.
Conclusion
PEG-tube placement is generally safe and helps in feeding and prolonging survival, but its impact on quality of life remains uncertain.
Supporting Evidence
- 63% of patients were male.
- Early complications included infection at the PEG tube site in 3% of patients.
- 60% of caregivers would choose PEG tube placement again if needed.
- 84% of caregivers noted ease in feeding with the PEG tube.
- 49% of caregivers expressed concerns about increased costs of care.
Takeaway
The PEG tube helps people eat better when they can't swallow, and most patients and caregivers think it's a good option.
Methodology
This descriptive analytic study reviewed medical records and conducted telephonic interviews with patients and caregivers about their experiences with PEG tube placement.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to reliance on caregiver reports and the subjective nature of quality of life assessments.
Limitations
The study's retrospective nature limited the ability to measure actual nutritional gain and quality of life objectively.
Participant Demographics
191 patients, 63% male, mean age 63 years.
Statistical Information
P-Value
< 0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website