Evidence-based journalism
2011

Evidence-Based Journalism

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Farrokh Habibzadeh, Mahboobeh Yadollahie

Hypothesis

Can the principles of evidence-based practice be applied to journalism?

Conclusion

The study suggests that evidence-based practices can improve the quality of journalism.

Supporting Evidence

  • Longer article titles receive more citations than shorter ones.
  • Blinding reviewers to authors' identities does not significantly improve peer review quality.
  • Evidence-based practices can be customized for journalism.

Takeaway

This study says that just because someone famous says something, it doesn't mean it's true; we should look for real evidence instead.

Methodology

The study discusses the application of evidence-based practices in journalism using the PICO framework.

Potential Biases

There is a risk of bias if editors rely solely on established authority without questioning the evidence.

Limitations

The findings may not apply to all settings, especially smaller scientific communities.

Participant Demographics

The study focuses on editors and reviewers in small scientific communities.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3325/cmj.2011.52.212

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication