Health development versus medical relief: The illusion versus the irrelevance of sustainability
2006
Health Development vs. Medical Relief: The Illusion of Sustainability
publication
Evidence: low
Author Information
Author(s): Gorik Ooms
Primary Institution: Médecins Sans Frontières
Hypothesis
Is the concept of sustainability in health care interventions relevant during emergencies?
Conclusion
Sustainability in health care is often an illusion, especially in the world's poorest countries where public health budgets are insufficient.
Supporting Evidence
- Development agencies often prioritize short-term relief over sustainable health solutions.
- Public health budgets in many poor countries are far below the minimum required for adequate health care.
- Many development agencies oppose free health care, believing it to be unsustainable.
Takeaway
This article talks about how some health programs seem to work well but aren't really sustainable, especially in poor countries that need help.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in the author's perspective as an executive director of a humanitarian organization.
Limitations
The essay does not provide empirical data to support its claims.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website