Differential recognition patterns of Schistosoma haematobium adult worm antigens by the human antibodies IgA, IgE, IgG1 and IgG4
2011

Understanding Antibody Responses to Schistosoma haematobium

Sample size: 215 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Francisca Mutapi, Colin Bourke, Yvonne Harcus, Nicholas Midzi, Tafadzwa Mduluza, Caroline M. Turner, Richard Burchmore, Richard M. Maizels

Primary Institution: Institute of Immunology & Infection Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh

Hypothesis

What are the recognition patterns of different human antibody isotypes against Schistosoma haematobium antigens?

Conclusion

The study found that different antibody isotypes recognize distinct patterns of Schistosoma haematobium antigens, which may inform vaccine development.

Supporting Evidence

  • IgG1 recognized the largest number of antigens, followed by IgE and IgA, while IgG4 detected the fewest.
  • The prevalence of S. haematobium infection in participants was 57%, with a mean infection intensity of 36 eggs/10 mL urine.
  • Participants with higher IgE/IgG4 ratios had lower levels of schistosome infection.
  • Three of the World Health Organisation’s 10 schistosome vaccine candidates were recognized by all isotypes tested.

Takeaway

This study looked at how different types of antibodies in humans recognize parts of a parasite that causes schistosomiasis, which can help in making better vaccines.

Methodology

The study used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and western blotting to analyze antibody responses to Schistosoma haematobium antigens in serum samples from participants.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in participant selection as only those who had never been treated for helminth infections were included.

Limitations

The study focused only on specific age groups and may not represent all demographics affected by schistosomiasis.

Participant Demographics

Participants were aged 7 to 18 years, with a balanced gender distribution (110 men and 105 women).

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.002

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1111/j.1365-3024.2010.01270.x

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication