Secondary insults prevalence, co-occurrence and relationship with outcome after severe TBI
2024

Secondary Insults After Severe TBI

Sample size: 822 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Donnelly Joseph, Beqiri Erta, Zeiler Frederick A., Smielewski Peter, Czosnyka Marek

Primary Institution: University of Cambridge, UK

Hypothesis

What is the prevalence, co-occurrence and prognostic importance of secondary insults due to deranged ICP, CPP or PRx after TBI?

Conclusion

ICP and autoregulation insults are common after TBI and often occur independently, with combined insults leading to worse outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • 76% of patients had elevated ICP for at least an hour.
  • 92% of patients had disturbed pressure reactivity.
  • 55% of patients had low CPP for at least an hour.
  • 40% of total monitoring time was spent with at least one secondary injury variable.

Takeaway

After a serious brain injury, many patients have problems with brain pressure and blood flow, which can make them sicker. If multiple problems happen at the same time, it can be worse for them.

Methodology

The study included severe TBI patients requiring ICP monitoring and assessed secondary insults based on defined thresholds for ICP, CPP, and PRx.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the retrospective nature of the study and variations in monitoring practices over time.

Limitations

The study's findings depend on the local clinician's decision for ICP monitoring and may be influenced by data interruptions during clinical monitoring.

Participant Demographics

Mean age of 39 years, 78.2% male, with 72.7% having a GCS score of 8 or less.

Statistical Information

P-Value

1.17

Confidence Interval

95%CI 1.09 to 1.28

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1016/j.bas.2024.102764

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication