Using standardized methods for research on HIV and injecting drug use in developing/transitional countries: case study from the WHO Drug Injection Study Phase II
2006

Research on HIV and Injecting Drug Use in Developing Countries

Sample size: 5000 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Des Jarlais Don C, Perlis Theresa E, Stimson Gerry V, Poznyak Vladimir

Primary Institution: World Health Organization

Hypothesis

How can standardized methods be effectively implemented in research on HIV and injecting drug use across different countries?

Conclusion

Standardized methods can be adapted to local conditions to improve the representation and generalizability of data on HIV and injecting drug use.

Supporting Evidence

  • Over 5,000 subjects were recruited from various cities.
  • Standardized methods were adapted to local contexts to improve data collection.
  • Rapid assessments helped identify suitable recruitment areas and local risk behaviors.

Takeaway

This study looked at how to gather information about drug users and HIV in different countries, making sure to use methods that fit each place's needs.

Methodology

Surveys were conducted in 12 cities with standardized operational guidelines, including structured interviews and HIV testing.

Potential Biases

Potential biases arose from recruitment methods and the hidden nature of drug-using populations.

Limitations

Challenges included recruitment difficulties, translation issues, and varying local conditions affecting data collection.

Participant Demographics

Participants included current injectors, former injectors, and never-injectors, with a mix of genders and ages across different cities.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-6-54

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication