Compliance with Protocols for Preventing Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Sepsis
Author Information
Author(s): Gwendolyn L. Gilbert, Moira C. Hewitt, Catherine M. Turner, Stephen R. Leeder
Primary Institution: Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research
Hypothesis
How do two different protocols for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis compare in terms of staff compliance?
Conclusion
About one-third of healthy women are eligible for intrapartum antibiotics to prevent neonatal GBS sepsis, but compliance with protocols is often poor.
Supporting Evidence
- 39% of women were eligible for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis.
- Compliance was 78% at Hospital A and 76% at Hospital B for GBS carriers.
- Only 65% of intrapartum GBS carriers received antibiotics due to poor predictive value of screening.
- Compliance was significantly lower at Hospital B for women with clinical risk factors.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well hospitals follow rules to give antibiotics to pregnant women to prevent infections in newborns, and found that many women who needed the antibiotics didn't get them.
Methodology
A prospective cohort study comparing two protocols for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis in two hospitals.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to differences in protocol implementation and staff training between the two hospitals.
Limitations
The study's compliance rates were only fair, and the predictive value of screening before 32 weeks was poor.
Participant Demographics
Women attending antenatal clinics at two hospitals, with a total of 1096 participants.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.03
Confidence Interval
95% CI, 64-74
Statistical Significance
p = 0.03
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website