The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization
2006

Validation of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ)

Sample size: 2127 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Terluin Berend, van Marwijk Harm WJ, Adèr Herman J, de Vet Henrica CW, Penninx Brenda WJH, Hermens Marleen LM, van Boeijen Christine A, van Balkom Anton JLM, van der Klink Jac JL, Stalman Wim AB

Primary Institution: VU University Medical Centre

Hypothesis

The 4DSQ is a valid tool for assessing distress, depression, anxiety, and somatization in primary care patients.

Conclusion

The 4DSQ is a valid self-report questionnaire for measuring distress, depression, anxiety, and somatization in primary care patients.

Supporting Evidence

  • The Distress scale was associated with any psychosocial diagnosis (AUC 0.79).
  • The Depression scale was associated with major depression (AUC = 0.83).
  • The Anxiety scale was associated with anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.66).
  • The Somatization scale was associated with GPs' suspicion of somatization (AUC = 0.65).
  • The 4DSQ scales showed considerable inter-correlations (r = 0.35-0.71).
  • CFA confirmed the 4-factor structure with a CFI of 0.92.
  • Measures of stress were mainly associated with Distress.
  • Distress was associated with psychosocial dysfunctioning, including sick leave.

Takeaway

The 4DSQ helps doctors understand how patients feel by asking about their distress, depression, anxiety, and physical symptoms.

Methodology

Data from 10 different primary care studies were analyzed using ROC and logistic regression analyses to assess criterion and construct validity.

Potential Biases

Potential biases due to the subjective nature of GP diagnoses and the reliance on self-reported data.

Limitations

Data were primarily collected for other purposes and were cross-sectional, limiting causal inferences.

Participant Demographics

The study included a diverse sample of primary care patients, with a mean age of 38.5 years and a majority being women (68%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-244X-6-34

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication