Multiple cancer site comparison of adjusted survival by hospital of treatment: an East Anglian study
2000

Survival Rates by Hospital for Cancer Patients in East Anglia

Sample size: 14527 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): D Stockton, T Davies

Primary Institution: East Anglian Cancer Intelligence Unit, University of Cambridge

Hypothesis

Which hospitals would benefit from investment and development in cancer care?

Conclusion

Younger patients with breast, ovarian, and rectal tumors have worse survival rates at certain hospitals, indicating a need for targeted improvements in cancer care.

Supporting Evidence

  • Survival rates were usually worse in hospitals without specialized cancer departments.
  • Significant differences in survival were noted for patients under 75 with specific cancer types.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well cancer patients do based on where they get treated, finding that some hospitals need to improve, especially for younger patients.

Methodology

A retrospective study analyzing cancer cases using uniform definitions and Cox's proportional hazards model.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in hospital selection and patient demographics.

Limitations

The study is limited to specific cancer types and may not represent all cancer patients.

Participant Demographics

Patients diagnosed with various cancers between 1989 and 1993, analyzed in two age groups.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1054/bjoc.1999.0901

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication