Australians’ Well-Being and Resilience During COVID-19: The Role of Trust, Misinformation, Intolerance of Uncertainty, and Locus of Control
2024

Australians' Well-Being and Resilience During COVID-19

Sample size: 1380 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Nida Denson, Kevin M. Dunn, Alanna Kamp, Ben Jehonathan, Daniel Pitman, Rachel Sharples, Grace Lim, Yin Paradies, Craig McGarty

Primary Institution: Western Sydney University

Hypothesis

What are the psychological factors that promoted or hindered Australians’ well-being and resilience during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic?

Conclusion

Interpersonal trust was a protective factor for well-being and resilience, while greater intolerance of uncertainty and an external locus of control were linked to poorer mental health outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Participants with greater interpersonal trust reported less depression, anxiety, stress, and loneliness.
  • Those with an external locus of control were more likely to be depressed and anxious.
  • COVID-19 beliefs were associated with poorer mental health outcomes.

Takeaway

This study shows that trusting others helps people feel better during tough times like the COVID-19 pandemic, while feeling uncertain and believing that things are out of your control can make you feel worse.

Methodology

A national online survey was conducted with Australians aged 16 years and over to examine psychological factors affecting well-being and resilience during the pandemic.

Potential Biases

The study may be subject to self-report bias as it relied on participants' perceptions and responses.

Limitations

The study used a correlational cross-sectional design, limiting causal claims, and the sample was not fully representative of the Australian population.

Participant Demographics

The sample included 57.1% females, with a significant number born overseas (39.4%) and a majority having an Anglo background (76.5%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/jcm13247495

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication