Comparison of Newly Diagnosed Ocular Hypertension and Open-Angle Glaucoma: Ocular Variables, Risk Factors, and Disease Severity
2012

Comparison of Ocular Hypertension and Open-Angle Glaucoma

Sample size: 405 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Yvonne M. Buys, Paul Harasymowycz, Rania Gaspo, Kenneth Kwok, Cindy M. L. Hutnik, Pierre Blondeau, Catherine M. Birt, Robert L. G. Piemontesi, Lisa F. Gould, Mark R. Lesk, Iqbal K. Ahmed

Primary Institution: University of Toronto

Hypothesis

What are the ocular variables, risk factors, and disease severity in newly diagnosed ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma?

Conclusion

Increased age is a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma, while smoking appears to decrease the risk compared to ocular hypertension.

Supporting Evidence

  • 72.1% of subjects had open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and 27.9% had ocular hypertension (OH).
  • 51.7% of OAG subjects had early disease at diagnosis.
  • Smoking was associated with a lower risk of OAG compared to OH.
  • Age was a significant risk factor for OAG.
  • Mean intraocular pressure was higher in OH than in OAG.
  • More OAG subjects had abnormal visual fields compared to OH subjects.
  • Significant differences in demographic characteristics were observed between OAG and OH groups.

Takeaway

This study looked at people with high eye pressure and glaucoma to see what makes them different. They found that older people are more likely to have glaucoma, and surprisingly, smoking might lower the risk.

Methodology

A multicentre, prospective, noninterventional, cross-sectional study with complete history and examination of eligible subjects.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to reliance on study site diagnosis and self-reported medical history.

Limitations

Self-reported risk factors may be unreliable, and there may be selection bias in the diagnosis of OAG and OH.

Participant Demographics

The majority of participants were Caucasian, with a mean age of 63.0 years for OAG and 56.5 years for OH.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P < 0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 2.93–22.88

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/2012/757106

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication