Variation in the Analysis of Positively Selected Sites Using Nonsynonymous/Synonymous Rate Ratios: An Example Using Influenza Virus
2011

Analyzing Positive Selection in Influenza Virus

Sample size: 86 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Chen Jiming, Sun Yingxue

Primary Institution: China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, China

Hypothesis

How effective is the ω ratio in identifying sites under positive selection in the HA1 gene of H3N2 human influenza viruses?

Conclusion

The analysis of the ω ratio shows significant variation in identifying positively selected sites, indicating low sensitivity.

Supporting Evidence

  • 43 out of 45 sites with ω >1 are involved in B-cell epitopes.
  • The analysis sensitivity could not be enhanced by including more sequences.
  • Significant variation in ω ratios was observed among different data sets.
  • Only one site was shared among all seven data sets under any of the models.

Takeaway

The study looked at how well a method called the ω ratio can find important changes in a virus that help it survive. It found that this method doesn't always work well.

Methodology

The study used seven overlapping sequence data sets to analyze the ω ratio in the HA1 gene of H3N2 influenza viruses.

Potential Biases

The method may miss sites under positive selection if no mutations occurred during the observation period.

Limitations

The analysis may be of low sensitivity and specificity in identifying sites under positive selection.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0019996

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication