Impact of molecular classification on prognosis in children and adolescents with spinal ependymoma: Results from the HIT-MED database
2024

Impact of Molecular Classification on Prognosis in Pediatric Spinal Ependymoma

Sample size: 83 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Lara Engertsberger, Martin Benesch, Martin Mynarek, Svenja Tonn, Denise Obrecht-Sturm, Thomas Perwein, Martina Stickan-Verfürth, Angela Funk, Beate Timmermann, Michael Bockmayr, Alicia Eckhardt, Alexander Claviez, Rolf-Dieter Kortmann, Markus J Riemenschneider, Torsten Pietsch, Brigitte Bison, Monika Warmuth-Metz, Kristian W Pajtler, Stefan Rutkowski, Ulrich Schüller

Primary Institution: Medical University of Graz, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Hospital Essen, University Hospital Magdeburg, University of Leipzig, Regensburg University Hospital, University of Bonn Medical Center, University Hospital Würzburg

Hypothesis

This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of molecular typing on pediatric spinal cord ependymomas.

Conclusion

Molecular typing of pediatric spinal ependymomas aids in identifying very high-risk MYCN-amplified ependymomas.

Supporting Evidence

  • 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 100% and 86%, respectively.
  • 5-year progression-free survival was 65%, while 10-year progression-free survival was 54%.
  • MYCN-amplification was associated with early relapses and death in patients.

Takeaway

Doctors can use special tests to figure out what type of spinal tumors kids have, which helps them understand how serious the tumors might be.

Methodology

The study included 83 patients with spinal ependymomas registered in the HIT-MED database, analyzing clinical and DNA methylation data.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the retrospective nature of the study and reliance on existing data.

Limitations

The study is retrospective and may have selection bias due to the limited number of patients in some subgroups.

Participant Demographics

Median age at diagnosis was 13.7 years, with 60% male and 40% female participants.

Statistical Information

P-Value

.64

Confidence Interval

[54–77]

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1093/noajnl/vdae179

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication