Follow-up of breast cancer in primary care vs specialist care: results of an economic evaluation
1999

Breast Cancer Follow-Up: Primary Care vs Specialist Care

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Grunfeld E, Gray A, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Coyle D, Cole D, Stewart J, Fitzpatrick R, Vessey M

Primary Institution: University of Oxford

Hypothesis

Does primary-care-centred follow-up for breast cancer patients lead to different outcomes compared to specialist-centred follow-up?

Conclusion

Primary-care follow-up for breast cancer patients does not delay recurrence diagnosis and is more cost-effective than specialist care.

Supporting Evidence

  • The RCT found no difference in the primary clinical outcomes between primary care and specialist care.
  • Costs to patients and the health service were lower in primary care.
  • Process measures of quality of care were superior in primary care.

Takeaway

This study shows that seeing your regular doctor for breast cancer check-ups can be just as good as going to a specialist, and it can save money.

Methodology

A randomized controlled trial comparing follow-up care in primary care versus specialist care, along with an economic evaluation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6690197

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication