Protocol for north of England and Scotland study of tonsillectomy and adeno-tonsillectomy in children (NESSTAC)
2006

Study Protocol for Tonsillectomy in Children

Sample size: 406 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): John Bond, Janet Wilson, Martin Eccles, Alessandra Vanoli, Nick Steen, Ray Clarke, Andew Zarod, Catherine Lock, Kate Brittain, Chris Speed, Nikki Rousseau

Primary Institution: Centre for Health Services Research, Newcastle University

Hypothesis

Does tonsillectomy/adeno-tonsillectomy reduce the number of episodes of recurrent sore throats among children to a clinically significant extent?

Conclusion

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tonsillectomy and adeno-tonsillectomy compared to standard non-surgical management in children with recurrent throat infections.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study will follow 406 children over two years to assess the impact of tonsillectomy on sore throat episodes.
  • Previous studies suggest that tonsillectomy may not provide significant long-term benefits.
  • The trial aims to address the lack of robust evidence regarding the effectiveness of tonsillectomy.

Takeaway

This study is trying to find out if removing tonsils helps kids with sore throats feel better and if it's worth the cost.

Methodology

A pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing surgical intervention with conventional medical treatment over two years.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the inability to blind participants and healthcare providers to treatment allocation.

Limitations

The study may be affected by external factors such as changes in infection rates and socio-economic differences in healthcare access.

Participant Demographics

Children aged 4–15 with recurrent sore throats referred by primary care.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6815-6-13

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication