Validity of Pain and Symptom Measures in HIV/AIDS Households
Author Information
Author(s): Pappas Gregory, Wolf R Cameron, Morineau Guy, Harding Richard
Primary Institution: Aga Khan University
Hypothesis
Can adapted measures of pain and symptom control be validly used in resource-poor settings with high HIV/AIDS prevalence?
Conclusion
The study suggests that the adapted measures can be effectively used in population-based surveys to monitor palliative care in high HIV/AIDS prevalence settings.
Supporting Evidence
- Chronically ill respondents reported more pain and symptoms than non-chronically ill respondents.
- Pain control did not differ significantly between chronically ill and non-chronically ill when controlling for pain levels.
- The adapted measures were found to be feasible and acceptable in the field.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well we can measure pain and symptoms in people with HIV in poorer countries, and found that the methods used work well.
Methodology
The study used purposive sampling to select households and adapted the Palliative Outcome Scale to assess pain and symptoms.
Potential Biases
The use of proxy respondents for those too sick to respond may have biased the data.
Limitations
The study's findings may not be generalizable to other countries, and the use of proxy respondents may introduce bias.
Participant Demographics
Participants were aged 18 to 59, with a majority being female and between 25 and 39 years old.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p < 0.001
Statistical Significance
p < 0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website