Pandemic Influenza Planning and Health Disparities
Author Information
Author(s): Philip Blumenshine, Arthur Reingold, Susan Egerter, Robin Mockenhaupt, Paula Braveman, James Marks
Primary Institution: University of California, San Francisco
Hypothesis
How might different socioeconomic and racial/ethnic groups in the United States fare in an influenza pandemic based on social factors?
Conclusion
Pandemic preparedness plans must explicitly address socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities to minimize avoidable suffering and death during an influenza pandemic.
Supporting Evidence
- Historical evidence shows that low-income persons fared worse during the 1918 pandemic.
- Disparities in healthcare access are well-documented and likely to worsen during a pandemic.
- Community-based interventions may help reduce influenza attack rates.
Takeaway
Some groups of people might get sick more than others during a flu pandemic because of their jobs, where they live, or how much money they have. We need to make sure everyone gets the help they need.
Methodology
The article discusses social factors affecting exposure, vulnerability, and treatment access during an influenza pandemic, using a conceptual framework to analyze disparities.
Potential Biases
Potential biases in pandemic planning may exacerbate existing health disparities if not addressed.
Limitations
The discussion is not exhaustive and does not provide specific solutions for all identified disparities.
Participant Demographics
The article focuses on socioeconomic and racial/ethnic groups in the United States.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website