Importance of Journals to UK Surgeons
Author Information
Author(s): Teresa H Jones, Steve Hanney, Martin J Buxton
Primary Institution: Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University
Hypothesis
Do UK surgeons consider peer-reviewed journals important for their clinical practice?
Conclusion
UK surgeons value peer-reviewed journals as important information sources, with a preference for national journals.
Supporting Evidence
- Peer-reviewed journals were the second most important information source for UK surgeons.
- The mode of journals read by surgeons was four, with academics reading more than non-academics.
- UK journals are generally preferred by UK surgeons.
Takeaway
Surgeons in the UK read a few key journals to help them with their work, and they prefer journals from their own country.
Methodology
A questionnaire survey was sent to 2,660 UK surgeons to assess the importance of peer-reviewed journals.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the selection of journals included in the questionnaire.
Limitations
The survey had a 38% response rate, which may not represent the views of all UK surgeons.
Participant Demographics
Survey included 2,660 UK surgeons, with 29% having academic responsibilities.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.010
Statistical Significance
p=0.010
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website