Validity of Self-Reported Depression Diagnosis
Author Information
Author(s): Sanchez-Villegas Almudena, Schlatter Javier, Ortuno Felipe, Lahortiga Francisca, Pla Jorge, Benito Silvia, Martinez-Gonzalez Miguel A
Primary Institution: University of Navarra
Hypothesis
Can a self-reported physician diagnosis of depression be validated using the SCID-I as the gold standard?
Conclusion
The self-reported diagnosis of depression in the SUN cohort is valid and can be used for further investigations.
Supporting Evidence
- 74.2% of self-reported depression cases were confirmed by SCID-I.
- 81.1% of those who did not report a depression diagnosis were confirmed as non-depressed.
- Higher confirmation rates of depression were found among men and younger participants.
Takeaway
This study shows that when people say they have been diagnosed with depression by a doctor, it's usually true, which helps researchers understand depression better.
Methodology
Participants were asked about their depression diagnosis and their responses were compared to evaluations using the SCID-I.
Potential Biases
Some participants were not interviewed face-to-face, which could affect the accuracy of the diagnosis.
Limitations
Participation in the validation study was low, which may introduce selection bias.
Participant Demographics
Participants included university graduates, with a mean age of 43.5 years, and a higher proportion of women among those with self-reported depression.
Statistical Information
Confidence Interval
95% CI = 63.3–85.1
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website