The rhetorician's craft, distinctions in science, and political morality
2006
Rhetoric and Morality in Psychiatry
Commentary
Author Information
Author(s): John Z Sadler
Primary Institution: The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Conclusion
The author critiques Szasz's views on psychiatry and emphasizes the importance of understanding rhetorical techniques in arguments.
Supporting Evidence
- Rhetorical techniques can persuade readers but may not lead to understanding.
- Szasz's views on mental illness have not evolved despite advancements in psychiatry.
- The author emphasizes the need for a balance between civil liberties and support for the disadvantaged.
Takeaway
This article talks about how some people use persuasive language to make their points, especially in discussions about psychiatry, and how it's important to recognize these techniques.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website