Diagnostic accuracy of the neurological upper limb examination II: Relation to symptoms of patterns of findings
2006

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Neurological Upper Limb Examination

Sample size: 82 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jepsen Jørgen R, Laursen Lise H, Hagert Carl-Göran, Kreiner Svend, Larsen Anders I

Primary Institution: Department of Occupational Medicine, Sydvestjysk Sygehus

Hypothesis

Can an upper limb neurological examination reliably identify patterns of findings suggesting upper limb focal neuropathies?

Conclusion

The study indicates that the neurological upper limb examination can improve diagnostic confidence for identifying upper limb neuropathies.

Supporting Evidence

  • The two examiners identified patterns suggesting focal neuropathy in 34 out of 36 symptomatic limbs.
  • The sensitivity and specificity of the examination were found to be 0.73 and 0.86, respectively.
  • The post-test probability of a limb being symptomatic improved from 0.46 to 0.81.

Takeaway

Doctors can use a special test to check if there's a problem with the nerves in your arm, which helps them figure out what's wrong.

Methodology

The study assessed 82 limbs using a neurological examination by two blinded examiners, focusing on muscle strength, sensibility, and mechanosensitivity.

Potential Biases

Potential bias from the examiners' prior knowledge and the subjective nature of some assessments.

Limitations

The study's findings may not apply to all patients with upper limb disorders, and further validation is needed.

Participant Demographics

41 patients, 22 males and 19 females, median age 44 years for males and 39 years for females.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.46

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2377-6-10

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication