Association between glucose to lymphocyte ratio and prognosis in patients with solid tumors
2024

Glucose to Lymphocyte Ratio and Cancer Prognosis

Sample size: 9472 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Liu Rongqiang, Shen Yankun, Cui Jiahui, Ma Wangbin, Wang Jianguo, Chen Chen, Wang Weixing

Primary Institution: Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China

Hypothesis

The study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio (GLR) in patients with solid tumors.

Conclusion

GLR can be used as an effective prognostic marker in patients with solid tumors.

Supporting Evidence

  • High GLR was significantly associated with unfavorable overall survival and disease-free/progression-free survival.
  • Subgroup analysis showed high GLR had better predictive value in liver, breast, and pancreatic cancers.
  • GLR combines glucose levels and lymphocyte counts to reflect metabolic and immune status.

Takeaway

This study found that a high glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio means worse outcomes for cancer patients, helping doctors identify who might need more help.

Methodology

A meta-analysis of 22 studies was conducted to evaluate overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence-free survival using pooled hazard ratios.

Potential Biases

There was a degree of publication bias observed for overall survival.

Limitations

The included studies were mostly retrospective and conducted in Asia, with small sample sizes.

Participant Demographics

The studies included patients with various solid tumors, primarily from China, Korea, and Turkey.

Statistical Information

P-Value

HR:1.48 for overall survival, HR:2.20 for disease-free/progression-free survival

Confidence Interval

95% CI:1.34-1.63 for overall survival, 95% CI:1.66-2.92 for disease-free/progression-free survival

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/fimmu.2024.1454393

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication