The 2006 California Heat Wave: Impacts on Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits
2009

Impact of the 2006 California Heat Wave on Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits

Sample size: 37100000 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Kim Knowlton, Miriam Rotkin-Ellman, Galatea King, Helene G. Margolis, Daniel Smith, Gina Solomon, Roger Trent, Paul English

Primary Institution: Natural Resources Defense Council

Hypothesis

Did any age or race/ethnicity groups experience increased hospitalizations and emergency department visits during the 2006 California heat wave?

Conclusion

The 2006 California heat wave significantly increased morbidity, particularly among children and the elderly, indicating that population acclimatization and adaptive capacity influenced risk.

Supporting Evidence

  • During the heat wave, there were 16,166 excess ED visits and 1,182 excess hospitalizations statewide.
  • ED visits for heat-related causes increased significantly, especially in the Central Coast region.
  • Children (0–4 years) and the elderly (≥ 65 years) were at the greatest risk for increased morbidity.
  • Significant increases in ED visits were observed for acute renal failure, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and electrolyte imbalance.

Takeaway

When it got really hot in California in 2006, many more people went to the hospital or emergency rooms, especially kids and older folks.

Methodology

The study aggregated county-level hospitalizations and ED visits for various causes during the heat wave and compared them to a reference period.

Potential Biases

Potential confounding by air pollution could affect the results, particularly for cardiovascular and respiratory morbidities.

Limitations

Data suppression and underreporting issues limited the ability to determine geographic variations in patient demographics.

Participant Demographics

The study included a diverse population of California residents, with specific focus on age and race/ethnicity groups.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 5.67–7.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1289/ehp.11594

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication