Trust in an Australian Genomics Repository
Author Information
Author(s): Brad Elphinstone, Jarrod Walshe, Dianne Nicol, Mark Taylor
Primary Institution: Swinburne University of Technology
Hypothesis
What governance mechanisms can enhance public trust in a national genomic repository for health research?
Conclusion
The study found that suitable baseline conditions for a genomic repository may not require additional governance mechanisms to optimize public trust and willingness to donate.
Supporting Evidence
- Two-thirds of respondents indicated they would share their genomic data if asked.
- Public management of the repository was preferred over commercial management.
- Concerns about data misuse were prevalent, particularly regarding insurance companies.
Takeaway
People are more likely to share their DNA if they trust the organization managing it, and they prefer public organizations over commercial ones.
Methodology
The study used semi-structured interviews and a national survey to gather data on public perceptions of genomic data sharing.
Potential Biases
The study may not capture the views of diverse communities, particularly First Nations Australians.
Limitations
The sample was predominantly White Australians and older individuals, which may not represent the broader population.
Participant Demographics
The sample included 614 men, 498 women, and five non-binary individuals, with a majority identifying as White Australian.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website