Identifying outcome-based indicators and developing a curriculum for a continuing medical education programme on rational prescribing using a modified Delphi process
2008

Developing a Curriculum for Rational Prescribing in Medical Education

Sample size: 30 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Esmaily Hamideh M, Savage Carl, Vahidi Rezagoli, Amini Abolghasem, Zarrintan Mohammad Hossein, Wahlstrom Rolf

Primary Institution: Karolinska Institutet

Hypothesis

Can a modified Delphi process effectively identify educational outcomes for rational prescribing in continuing medical education for general physicians?

Conclusion

Consensus on learning outcomes was achieved, and an educational guideline was designed for rational prescribing.

Supporting Evidence

  • The Delphi process involved 30 stakeholders to gather expert opinions.
  • 21 learning outcomes were identified through the consensus process.
  • Six educational topics were determined for the CME programme.

Takeaway

Doctors need to learn how to prescribe medicines properly, and experts worked together to create a plan to teach them this important skill.

Methodology

The study used a two-round Delphi consensus process followed by expert panel discussions to identify educational outcomes and develop curricular content.

Potential Biases

Potential bias from the selection of expert panel members and their backgrounds.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable beyond the specific context of Iranian general practitioners.

Participant Demographics

30 stakeholders including general practitioners, CME decision makers, pharmacists, pharmacologists, and medical specialists from Iran.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6920-8-33

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication