Oncologists' Ability to Identify Patient Distress
Author Information
Author(s): Söllner W, DeVries A, Steixner E, Lukas P, Sprinzl G, Rumpold G, Maislinger S
Primary Institution: Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria
Hypothesis
How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling?
Conclusion
Oncologists struggle to accurately identify severely distressed cancer patients and their need for psychosocial support.
Supporting Evidence
- 20–40% of cancer patients show emotional distress.
- Oncologists recognized severe distress in only 11 of 30 severely distressed patients.
- Concordance of oncologists' estimations with screening instruments was weak.
Takeaway
This study found that doctors often miss signs of distress in cancer patients, which means some patients might not get the help they need.
Methodology
The study assessed distress, perceived social support, and desire for counselling in cancer patients while oncologists estimated these factors.
Potential Biases
Oncologists' recommendations were influenced by disease progression and denial behavior rather than actual patient distress.
Limitations
The concordance between oncologists' estimations and screening results was weak.
Participant Demographics
Cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, with noted lower recognition in head and neck cancer, lung cancer, and lower class patients.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website