Developing the Evaluation Protocol for the Engaging with Quality Initiative
Author Information
Author(s): Bryony Soper, Martin Buxton, Stephen Hanney, Wija Oortwijn, Amanda Scoggins, Nick Steel, Tom Ling
Primary Institution: Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University
Hypothesis
How can the evaluation of the Engaging with Quality Initiative effectively measure improvements in healthcare quality through clinician engagement?
Conclusion
The developmental approach to the evaluation protocol allowed for a better understanding of quality improvement and its implementation in healthcare.
Supporting Evidence
- The Health Foundation provided £4.3 million for the initiative.
- The evaluation protocol was designed to be emergent and adaptable.
- Project teams had varying levels of understanding about quality improvement.
- Evaluation aimed to measure both clinical outcomes and professional engagement.
Takeaway
This study is about figuring out how to check if a program that helps doctors improve healthcare is working well. It shows that learning and changing as you go is really important.
Methodology
The evaluation protocol was developed through interaction with project teams, focusing on understanding their approaches and the context of their projects.
Potential Biases
There was a risk of bias due to the evaluators needing to balance objectivity with support for project teams.
Limitations
The evaluation faced challenges due to the diversity of projects and the varying levels of understanding of quality improvement among project teams.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website