Coal Home Heating and Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Relation to Lower Respiratory Illness in Czech Children, from Birth to 3 Years of Age
2006

Impact of Coal Heating and Tobacco Smoke on Respiratory Illness in Young Children

Sample size: 452 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Rebecca J. Baker, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Miroslav Dostál, Jean A. Keller, Jiři Nožička, František Kotìšovec, Jan Dejmek, Dana Loomis, Radim J. Šrám

Primary Institution: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill

Hypothesis

How do indoor pollution from tobacco and home heating affect respiratory health in young children?

Conclusion

Maternal smoking and coal home heating increased the risk of lower respiratory illness in children during their first three years of life, especially in those not breast-fed.

Supporting Evidence

  • Children from homes heated by coal had a 45% higher incidence of lower respiratory illness compared to those using other heating sources.
  • Maternal smoking during pregnancy increased the incidence of lower respiratory illness by 48%.
  • Children who were never breast-fed experienced significantly higher risks associated with coal heating and maternal smoking.

Takeaway

Kids who live in homes heated with coal or where their moms smoke are more likely to get sick with breathing problems, especially if they weren't breast-fed.

Methodology

A birth cohort study followed children for three years to assess the incidence of lower respiratory illness based on pediatric records and questionnaires.

Potential Biases

Potential misclassification of heating type due to families switching from coal to gas during the study period.

Limitations

The study relied on retrospective data collection, which may introduce recall bias, and lacked information on changes in home environmental characteristics over time.

Participant Demographics

Children born between 1994 and 1996 in two districts of the Czech Republic, with a mix of ethnic backgrounds and varying maternal education levels.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 1.07–1.97

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1289/ehp.8501

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication