Prognostic factors affecting survival after surgical resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a two-unit experience over 10 years
2006

Factors Affecting Survival After Surgery for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Sample size: 61 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Chiappa Antonio, Zbar Andrew P, Innis Michael, Garriques Stuart, Bertani Emilio, Biffi Roberto, Pruneri Giancarlo, Luzzato Felipe, Vigna Paolo Della, Trovato Cristina, Andreoni Bruno

Primary Institution: European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Italy

Hypothesis

What factors affect survival after surgical resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors?

Conclusion

Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors are resectable, and survival is mainly dependent on mitotic count and the completeness of resection.

Supporting Evidence

  • 90% of patients underwent complete surgical resection.
  • 5-year overall survival rate was 88% for all patients.
  • 5-year disease-free survival rate was 75% for completely resected cases.
  • High mitotic count (> 10 mitoses/50 HPF) was associated with worse prognosis.
  • R0 resection was strongly associated with better overall survival.

Takeaway

Doctors studied 61 patients with stomach tumors to see what helps them live longer after surgery. They found that how fast the tumor grows and if it was completely removed are really important.

Methodology

The study analyzed 61 patients who underwent surgical resection, examining patient, tumor, and treatment variables to identify survival factors.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the retrospective nature of the study and the lack of a standardized follow-up protocol.

Limitations

The study had no strict follow-up protocol and relied on various follow-up methods, which may affect data consistency.

Participant Demographics

29 males and 32 females, median age 60 years (range: 23–86 years).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p < 0.0001

Confidence Interval

CI 1.295–117.781

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1477-7819-4-73

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication