Frequency, prognostic impact, and subtype association of 8p12, 8q24, 11q13, 12p13, 17q12, and 20q13 amplifications in breast cancers
2006

Amplifications in Breast Cancer: Frequency and Prognostic Impact

Sample size: 547 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Letessier Anne, Sircoulomb Fabrice, Ginestier Christophe, Cervera Nathalie, Monville Florence, Gelsi-Boyer Véronique, Esterni Benjamin, Geneix Jeannine, Finetti Pascal, Zemmour Christophe, Viens Patrice, Charafe-Jauffret Emmanuelle, Jacquemier Jocelyne, Birnbaum Daniel, Chaffanet Max

Primary Institution: Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Département d'Oncologie Moléculaire, UMR599 Inserm/Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France

Hypothesis

The study aims to assess the frequencies and clinical impact of specific chromosomal amplifications in breast cancers.

Conclusion

The study establishes the frequencies, prognostic impacts, and subtype associations of various amplifications and co-amplifications in breast cancers.

Supporting Evidence

  • Amplification of 8p12 was observed in 22.8% of cases.
  • Amplification of 11q13 was found in 19.6% of cases.
  • Amplifications of 8p12 and 17q12 were associated with poor outcomes.
  • Amplification of 12p13 was associated with the basal molecular subtype.
  • Co-amplification of 8p12 and 11q13 was the most frequent.
  • Amplifications were correlated with high grade tumors.

Takeaway

This study looked at how often certain genes are copied too many times in breast cancer and how that affects patient outcomes.

Methodology

The study analyzed 547 invasive breast tumors using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on a tissue microarray.

Limitations

The study may have limitations related to the representativeness of the sample and the potential for non-informative results due to lack of tissue or non-interpretable data.

Participant Demographics

The average age at diagnosis was 59 years, with a range from 25 to 94 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.15

Confidence Interval

95% CI

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2407-6-245

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication