Estimating Height in Children Using Body Measurements
Author Information
Author(s): Negrão Isabela Lima, de Andrade Márcia Reimol, Rodrigues José Carlos R., Serapião Yasmim de França, Damázio Laila Cristina M., Lamounier Joel Alves, Tibúrcio Jacqueline Domingues
Primary Institution: Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ)
Hypothesis
Which segmental measure provides the most accurate estimate of height in children and adolescents?
Conclusion
Segmental measures, particularly knee-heel length and tibial length, are effective for estimating a child's height, especially in clinical settings.
Supporting Evidence
- The study found that knee-heel length provided the closest estimate to actual height.
- Segmental measures can be particularly useful for bedridden patients.
- Statistical tests showed significant differences between measured and estimated heights.
Takeaway
Doctors can use measurements from arms and legs to guess how tall a child is when they can't measure their height directly.
Methodology
The study used an analytical cross-sectional design to compare segmental measures with directly measured height in children aged 0 to 14 years.
Potential Biases
Potential measurement bias exists due to the reliance on segmental measures for height estimation.
Limitations
The study excluded children with conditions that affect height measurement, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
Participants were children aged 0 to 14 years, with a slight majority being male (53.2%).
Statistical Information
P-Value
<0.001
Confidence Interval
95%
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website