Non-invasive stroke volume assessment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: left-sided data mandatory
2008

Measuring Stroke Volume in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients

Sample size: 34 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Mauritz Gert-Jan, Marcus J Tim, Boonstra Anco, Postmus Pieter E, Westerhof Nico, Vonk-Noordegraaf Anton

Primary Institution: VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Hypothesis

The study aims to investigate the accuracy of pulmonary artery flow for measuring stroke volume in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Conclusion

Stroke volume from pulmonary artery flow has limited accuracy in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients, and left ventricular volumes or aorta flow should be preferred for measurement.

Supporting Evidence

  • Stroke volume from pulmonary artery flow showed a mean difference of -4.2 ml compared to the Fick method.
  • Left ventricular volumes-derived stroke volume showed the best correlation with the Fick method.
  • Right ventricular volumes-derived stroke volume showed poor agreement with the Fick-derived stroke volume.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well we can measure blood flow in patients with a specific lung condition. It found that one method isn't very accurate, so we should use better methods.

Methodology

Thirty-four patients underwent both cardiovascular magnetic resonance and right-sided heart catheterization to compare stroke volume measurements.

Potential Biases

Potential underestimation of stroke volume due to right-to-left shunting in some patients.

Limitations

The study could not perform catheter studies and CMR examinations simultaneously, and the sample size for aorta flow measurements was small.

Participant Demographics

34 patients, 23 female (68%) and 11 male (32%), mean age 45 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.039

Confidence Interval

95% Limits of Agreement: -18.3 to 26.8 ml

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1532-429X-10-51

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication