Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures
2008

Seat Belt Use Among Rear Passengers: Comparing Self-Reported and Observational Data

Sample size: 16040 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Francesco Zambon, Ugo Fedeli, Maria Marchesan, Elena Schievano, Antonio Ferro, Paolo Spolaore

Primary Institution: Regional Center for Epidemiology, Veneto Region

Hypothesis

Does self-reported seat belt usage among rear seat passengers overestimate actual usage compared to observational data?

Conclusion

Self-reported seat belt usage by rear passengers is higher than observational findings, but needs adjustment for accuracy.

Supporting Evidence

  • Self-reported rates were always higher than observational findings.
  • The overall over-reporting factor was found to be 1.4.
  • No significant changes in the over-reporting factor were observed over time.

Takeaway

People often say they wear seat belts more than they actually do, especially in the back seat of cars. This study shows that self-reports are usually higher than what is really observed.

Methodology

The study used cross-sectional self-report surveys and observational studies conducted in two time periods (2003 and 2005) in the Veneto Region, Italy.

Potential Biases

Potential bias from self-reported data and differences in demographics between survey participants and non-participants.

Limitations

Self-reported data may be biased due to social desirability, and the low response rate could affect the representativeness of the sample.

Participant Demographics

Non-institutionalized adults living in households with a telephone in the Veneto Region.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.001

Confidence Interval

(95% CI 9.1–12.1)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-8-233

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication