Gender Differences in Genetic Risk Profiles for Cardiovascular Disease
2008

Gender Differences in Genetic Risk Profiles for Cardiovascular Disease

Sample size: 14140 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Silander Kaisa, Alanne Mervi, Kristiansson Kati, Saarela Olli, Ripatti Samuli, Auro Kirsi, Karvanen Juha, Kulathinal Sangita, Niemelä Matti, Ellonen Pekka, Vartiainen Erkki, Jousilahti Pekka, Saarela Janna, Kuulasmaa Kari, Evans Alun, Perola Markus, Salomaa Veikko, Peltonen Leena

Primary Institution: National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland

Hypothesis

Do genetic risk profiles for coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular disease differ between genders?

Conclusion

The study found that genetic risk factors for cardiovascular disease differ significantly between men and women, with more gender-specific effects identified in women.

Supporting Evidence

  • Several allelic variants conferred disease risk for both genders, including specific variants in coagulation factor XII.
  • Gender-specific effects were identified, with more variants showing significant associations in women than in men.
  • Statistical evidence of variant-gender interaction was found for multiple genetic variants related to coronary heart disease.

Takeaway

This study shows that men and women have different genetic risks for heart disease, which means doctors should consider gender when looking at heart health.

Methodology

The study used a case-cohort design to analyze genetic variants in two Finnish population cohorts, focusing on their association with cardiovascular diseases and related risk factors.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the case-cohort design and the specific population studied.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable beyond the Finnish population, and the power to detect smaller genetic effects was limited.

Participant Demographics

The study included Finnish individuals from two cohorts, with a total of 14140 participants.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Confidence Interval

95% CI

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0003615

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication