“Simple Rules for Editors”? Here is one to tackle neglected problems of publishing
2007
A Rule for Editors to Recognize Contributions
publication
Author Information
Author(s): Thomas C. Erren, Michael Erren
Primary Institution: University of Cologne
Hypothesis
How can editors better recognize the contributions of young scientists in publishing?
Conclusion
The authors propose that editors require clear statements of contribution from all authors to ensure proper recognition.
Supporting Evidence
- Many young researchers feel they do not receive appropriate recognition for their work.
- Current practices in authorship recognition are deemed insufficient.
- Editors are encouraged to develop and implement contributorship policies.
Takeaway
The study suggests that editors should make sure everyone who helped with a research project gets credit for their work.
Potential Biases
There may be bias in how contributions are recognized or reported in publications.
Limitations
The article does not provide empirical data to support its claims.
Participant Demographics
Young researchers in Europe and the United States.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website