Evaluating Cloning in Ancient DNA Studies
Author Information
Author(s): Winters Misa, Barta Jodi Lynn, Monroe Cara, Kemp Brian M.
Primary Institution: Washington State University
Hypothesis
Does direct sequencing of ancient DNA provide results comparable to those obtained through cloning?
Conclusion
Cloning is not always necessary for obtaining reliable ancient DNA sequences, as direct sequencing can yield comparable results.
Supporting Evidence
- Direct sequencing provided the same data as cloning in this study.
- Cloning should not be the default method for obtaining consensus sequences.
- Direct sequencing can be more time and cost efficient.
Takeaway
This study shows that sometimes you can just read the DNA directly instead of making copies, and it works just as well.
Methodology
The study compared cloned and direct sequences from ancient northern fur seal DNA using majority rules and the Consensus Confidence Program.
Limitations
The results may not apply to all ancient DNA studies, especially those requiring cloning due to contamination.
Participant Demographics
Ancient northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) from the Amaknak Bridge Site in Unalaska, AK.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website