A national cross-sectional survey of health literacy of caregivers attending Canadian pediatric emergency departments
2024

Health Literacy of Caregivers in Canadian Pediatric Emergency Departments

Sample size: 1957 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Rajagopal Manasi, Ali Samina, Ma Keon, Yaskina Maryna, Morrison Andrea, Schreiner Kurt, Leung Julie, Scott Shannon, Beer Darcy, Clerc Paul, Crawford Tyrus, Gouin Serge, Poonai Naveen, Principi Tania, Stang Antonia, Weingarten Laura, Curran Janet

Primary Institution: University of Alberta

Hypothesis

What is the health literacy level of caregivers attending Canadian pediatric emergency departments and how does it relate to demographic and visit-specific variables?

Conclusion

Over one in four caregivers presenting to Canadian pediatric emergency departments have low health literacy, which may limit their ability to participate in healthcare decisions for their child.

Supporting Evidence

  • 12.0% of caregivers had a high likelihood of limited health literacy.
  • 16.5% had possible limited health literacy.
  • 71.5% demonstrated adequate health literacy.
  • Caregivers with a university degree were more likely to have adequate health literacy.

Takeaway

Many parents who take their kids to the emergency room might not understand health information well, which can make it hard for them to take care of their children.

Methodology

A descriptive, cross-sectional survey design with medical record review was used to assess health literacy using the Newest Vital Sign tool.

Potential Biases

Selection bias may have occurred as caregivers with limited literacy might have refused to participate.

Limitations

The study was limited to English and French speakers, and caregivers of critically ill children were excluded.

Participant Demographics

Mean caregiver age was 37.8 years, 74.3% were mothers, and 51.9% had a university/professional degree.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI (1.11–1.94)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0314826

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication