Misuse of "study drugs:" prevalence, consequences, and implications for policy
2006

Misuse of Study Drugs: Prevalence and Policy Implications

Sample size: 10904 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Sussman Steve, Pentz Mary Ann, Spruijt-Metz Donna, Miller Toby

Primary Institution: University of Southern California

Hypothesis

What are the prevalence and consequences of the misuse of prescription stimulants among emerging adults?

Conclusion

Much more work is needed on prescription stimulant misuse assessment and developing prevention and cessation education efforts.

Supporting Evidence

  • Approximately 4% of older teens and emerging adults misuse study drugs annually.
  • Misuse can lead to addiction, negative reactions, and medical complications.
  • Policy implications include limiting access and increasing public education about the risks.

Takeaway

Some students use prescription drugs to help them study, but this can be dangerous and lead to serious problems.

Methodology

The study involved self-report surveys of college students across 119 nationally representative colleges.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-reporting and the varying definitions of misuse across studies.

Limitations

The results may not be generalizable due to varying participation rates and the reliance on self-reported data.

Participant Demographics

The study focused on college students, particularly those aged 18-25, with a notable prevalence among white and Hispanic males.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1747-597X-1-15

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication