Relationship between care-givers' misconceptions and non-use of ITNs by under-five Nigerian children
2011

Understanding Why Caregivers Don't Use Insecticide-Treated Nets for Children in Nigeria

Sample size: 7223 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Arogundade Ekundayo D, Adebayo Samson B, Anyanti Jennifer, Nwokolo Ernest, Ladipo Olaronke, Ankomah Augustine, Meremikwu Martin M

Primary Institution: Society for Family Health, Port Harcourt Crescent, Area 11, Abuja, Nigeria

Hypothesis

Do caregivers' misconceptions about malaria influence the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) for under-five children in Nigeria?

Conclusion

Caregivers' misconceptions about malaria significantly reduce the likelihood of using insecticide-treated nets for their children.

Supporting Evidence

  • Caregivers with misconceptions about malaria are less likely to use ITNs.
  • Education level is positively associated with ITN use.
  • Knowledge of malaria prevention methods increases the likelihood of using ITNs.
  • Misconceptions about malaria causes are prevalent among caregivers.
  • Geopolitical zones influence ITN ownership and use.
  • Correct knowledge of malaria symptoms does not significantly affect ITN use.
  • Community education can improve ITN utilization.
  • Misconceptions can lead to delays in seeking appropriate treatment.

Takeaway

Some parents think wrong things about malaria, which makes them less likely to use special nets that keep kids safe from getting sick.

Methodology

Structured questionnaires were administered to caregivers, and bivariate analysis and multinomial logit models were used to identify determinants of ITN use.

Potential Biases

Potential biases in self-reported data from caregivers.

Limitations

The study may not account for all socio-economic and cultural factors influencing ITN use.

Participant Demographics

Caregivers of children under five years, with a mean age of 31.1 years, and a mix of urban (44%) and rural (46%) residents.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p < 0.0001

Confidence Interval

0.747 to 0.960

Statistical Significance

p < 0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1475-2875-10-170

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication