Avoiding Portacaval Shunts in Liver Transplant Candidates
Author Information
Author(s): Brems, J.J., Hiatt, J.R., Klein, A.S., Millis, J.M., Colonna, J.O., Quinones-Baldrich, W.J., Ramming, K.P., Busuttil, R.W.
Primary Institution: The University of Chicago
Hypothesis
Should portasystemic shunts be avoided in potential liver transplant candidates?
Conclusion
Portacaval shunts should be avoided in patients who may be considered for liver transplantation.
Supporting Evidence
- Mean blood loss and hospital stay were highest in the portacaval group.
- Retransplants and deaths were limited to the portacaval group.
- Distal splenorenal shunts are recommended for younger patients not needing immediate transplantation.
- A mesocaval II-graft is preferred for current liver transplant candidates.
Takeaway
Doctors found that certain types of shunts can make liver transplants harder, so they suggest not using portacaval shunts for patients who might need a transplant.
Methodology
The study involved 15 patients with prior portasystemic shunts who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation, analyzing outcomes based on shunt type.
Potential Biases
The use of retrospective data to make recommendations was questioned.
Limitations
The study did not clarify whether the shunt operations were performed by the same surgical team or discuss the underlying liver disease in detail.
Participant Demographics
Patients included a mix of those with different types of portasystemic shunts.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website